Indonesia is a country that is very rich in its natural
wealth, but Indonesia still cannot be called an advanced country due to the
lack of knowledge for processing natural resources, therefore Indonesia is
still said to be a developing country. Indonesia has various economic systems,
both from the liberal economic system, the economic system of etatism and the
pancasila economic system better known as the mixed economic system, but still
Indonesia is still classified as a developing country. Whice is the main
problem here is which economic system is suitable for Indonesia ?
In my opinion the economy is suitable or more appropriate
for the Indonesian state, namely, a pancasila economic system (mixed economic
system), because this system implements cooperation between the government and
the private sector. Both the private sector and the government are recognized,
when economic activities occur and problems that arise in a country are handled
together in order to achieve a good efficiency.
In this mixed economic system, the private sector has the
function of determining the activities to be carried out related to production
plans, distribution lines and consumption targets. While the government's
function lies in supervision and control. So that between the government and
the private sector has a portion and their respective roles for economic
activities in a country. The purpose of intervention by the government in a
mixed economic system is to avoid adverse consequences or unfavorable things
arising from a centralized and liberal economic system, for example there is a
monopoly on economic resources by certain parties.
Maybe not all choose a mixed economic system, because every
human being has a different opinion does not have to be the same. Even though
the economic system in Indonesia does not only have one system, but more than
one economic system.
reference:
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar